Each Paper: $300
Abstract
This article examines the evolution of Global South solidarity within the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) through the lens of the Group of 77 (G77). Despite the G77’s well-known role as a collective platform for developing countries to articulate shared interests and positions, scholarly debate persists over whether its solidarity has endured or has fragmented amid growing internal heterogeneity. This study analyzes Global South solidarity through two dimensions: voting alignment in UNGA roll-call votes among G77 members and their rhetorical alignment in general debate speeches. The findings show that G77 voting solidarity remains robust, though it declined moderately after the Cold War, whereas rhetorical solidarity has strengthened in the post-Cold War era. Contrary to conventional expectations, economic and political heterogeneity do not undermine G77 cohesion. Instead, power disparities generate fragmentation, with weaker states diverging in voting behavior and stronger states adopting distinct rhetoric. A case study of Mexico illustrates the fluidity and strategic nature of solidarity, as the country balances Global South commitments with North American economic integration. These findings together challenge deterministic accounts of fragmentation, underscoring the resilience and adaptability of Global South solidarity and the G77’s continuing relevance in global affairs.
Paper Acceptance Rate: 74%
International Journal of Arts, Humanities & Social Science
International Journal of Business & Management Studies
IJAHSS by IPRPD is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
