Abstract
We shall see that as the Master of suspicion,
Marx rejects capitalism, which he considers to be a system of bourgeois
oppression, absurd and decadent. The latter eludes the importance of the social
question in the historical future of a society. Trampling on the lyrical
illusions of practical rationality, he insists on the rigidity of economic and
social determinisms, to which he confers an over determinant role in
sub-estimating the impact of cognitive and/or psychological mechanisms on the
exercise of state power. We will explain how dialectical materialism in Marx
joins in many respects the methodological revolution initiated by Nietzsche,
particularly as regards its requirement to contextualize a real understood as a
fabric of forces, in order to understand the origin of the dominant values and
that of the capitalist system. Moreover, it will be important to develop the
idea that within a civil society, itself prey to a crisis of the sittlichkeit
(the ethical life), history tends to separate the interests in favor of
imperceptible cowards perverse become legion, while insidiously affecting a
social body incapable of escaping from material contingencies. We will then
have the right to question the way in which revolutions occur?