Abstract
This research
examines the factors that influence health-related stereotypes against
immigrants, with a focus on how human capital, conservative ideology, and
economic anxiety impact these
perceptions across different immigrant groups in the United
States. The study uses Ordinary Least
Squares (OLS) regression analysis of data from the 2020
Collaborative Multi-racial Post-Election Survey to assess attitudes towards all immigrants,
as well as specifically Mexican and Chinese immigrants.
Objective: Health stereotypes
often depict immigrants as carriers of diseases and burdens on society, which
affect public opinion and policy. This
study aims to analyze the roles of human capital,
political ideology, and economic conditions in shaping these stereotypes.
Method: Using OLS regression,
the analysis explores the association between stereotyping and various predictors, including conservative ideology (measured
objectively and subjectively), human capital,
and economic anxiety. Disaggregating the data by immigrant
group allows for nuanced insights into the interplay of these factors.
Results: The results reveal
moderate levels of stereotyping across all groups, with variations by immigrant origin. Objective
measures of conservative ideology show a strong correlation with increased
stereotyping, particularly against Mexican immigrants.
Higher human capital is associated with reduced stereotyping, while economic anxiety consistently
exacerbates negative stereotypes across all groups. Furthermore, Republican affiliation and racial identity
are correlated with heightened stereotyping, especially against Chinese
immigrants.
Discussion: The findings
highlight the complexity of the factors
contributing to health-related
stereotypes and emphasize the importance of addressing educational and economic
elements to mitigate these biases. Tailored interventions that take into account the distinct
dynamics of each immigrant group are crucial for reducing stereotypes
and improving integration and health outcomes.