Abstract
The Hypnerotomachia Poliphili, published
anonymously in 1499, has long posed puzzles for historians and scholars as to
the full depth of its meaning, such as, the name of the illustrator, why it was
published through the Aldine Press in Venice, but perhaps most notably in
twentieth century research, why it was published anonymously and who the author
actually was. There are by now numerous suggestions for authorship, ranging
from Cosimo d’Medici to Leon Battista Alberti, the Francesco Colonna of Venice
to the Colonna of Rome. This paper, however, does not posit a new suggestion
but rather critiques the suggestions made over the last century and the present
one and suggests a narratological method of biographical research for
authorship profiling for future authorial research.